Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Illinois - Genius with a "J"
So our governor, realizing that state needs to reduce its spending, and not wanting to go after any entitlements or anything like that, seems to have proposed the following cuts to education:
1) We must consolidate school districts because we have too many and having fewer will reduce costs. This will mean closing schools, of course.
2) We will cut funding to the districts for their transportation budgets. They will have to pay for that themselves.
MY ISSUE: Having grown up rural, I know that if you close schools, you will necessarily force MORE and LONGER bus routes to get the kids to schools. Thus, consolidating school districts means you will see your bus costs go up, and buses already are a huge MANDATORY expense for rural districts. This strikes me as an unfunded mandate or at least an increased mandate coupled with decreased funding. Double wammie. The school districts will have to cut program and teaching to accommodate these new costs; that or ask for tax levies.
1) We must consolidate school districts because we have too many and having fewer will reduce costs. This will mean closing schools, of course.
2) We will cut funding to the districts for their transportation budgets. They will have to pay for that themselves.
MY ISSUE: Having grown up rural, I know that if you close schools, you will necessarily force MORE and LONGER bus routes to get the kids to schools. Thus, consolidating school districts means you will see your bus costs go up, and buses already are a huge MANDATORY expense for rural districts. This strikes me as an unfunded mandate or at least an increased mandate coupled with decreased funding. Double wammie. The school districts will have to cut program and teaching to accommodate these new costs; that or ask for tax levies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)