I almost didn’t dignify this with a post, but I am trying to be more light hearted in here. The article speaks for itself.
As a practical matter, I’m not sure what I think of it. We’re supposed to be an ancient and honorable profession. I think that advertisements like this detract from respect for the profession. In undergrad at Gustavus, I was in a group that did a research on legal advertising. Our group concluded that while none of our focus group participants thought that any lawyer advertisements we showed them (a random sampling of a weeks worth of mid-day legal advertisements mostly of the “Have you been hurt in an accident?” variety) were unethical, they almost uniformly thought the advertisements made them think less of lawyers. This seems to fit that pattern.
My problem with these advertisements, to the extent I have a problem, stems not so much from their content as their message. Honestly, I could care less if what’s-her-name appeared buck naked, full-frontal, etc. As far as advertisement goes, it doesn’t matter if these are really her or some model she hired to be on her billboard. The troubling part is the self-gratification based attack on an institution that arguably forms a fundamental part of our societal structure. While I don’t see myself as particularly pro-marriage (mostly, I suspect, as a political matter), I don’t think an attorney, a member of a theoretically dignified profession, should attack it either.
No comments:
Post a Comment